Why I upgraded from Vista to Server 2003
#1
Posted 24 February 2008 - 05:52 PM
1) Server 2003 does not have as much cr@p as Vista, does. Seriously do we need all of those hungary system resources?
2) Far more reliable and stable (does not randomly crash)
3) Has decent boot ups and shutdown times, unlike Vista where in the time its doing it; you could go to Mars and back
4) Software and games support is better, lets face it. How many apps lag or just run like sh@t on Vista?
5) My system feels faster (sure it has 4GB RAM); but does Vista really need to use over 2GB when I am doing NOTHING.
On this note I do not think I wasted my money, I am sure Vista will be decent after SP2, or if SP1 is fixed up
#2
Posted 24 February 2008 - 08:41 PM
#3
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:09 PM
#4
Posted 24 February 2008 - 11:57 PM
With Aero off, DreamScenes off, a lot of other crap off, I still idle at a minimum 800mb RAM usage.
What
the
hell
is
going
on?!?!?!?
#5
Posted 25 February 2008 - 06:44 AM
#7
Posted 25 February 2008 - 02:15 PM
XP x64. Kick a$$
#8
Posted 27 February 2008 - 05:56 AM
#10
Posted 27 February 2008 - 04:57 PM
Shhhhh.... He could be scanning our BRAIN right now !!!
Edited by TheBearLT, 27 February 2008 - 06:04 PM.
#11
Posted 04 March 2008 - 08:28 AM
#12
Posted 04 March 2008 - 09:03 AM
#13
Posted 04 March 2008 - 09:06 AM
#14
Posted 04 March 2008 - 08:43 PM
#15
Posted 05 March 2008 - 04:33 AM
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users