Top 10 Reasons to Install Windows Server 2003 SP2
#16
Posted 01 May 2007 - 02:34 AM
#17
Posted 01 May 2007 - 03:17 AM
hog, on Apr 30 2007, 07:34 PM, said:
Do you really want us to share it with you? That actually might make an interesting thread ,but ta...
maybe not here. While this really is a more like a
"Long live x64 SP2!!!! " thread, (thanx WFO)
asking for why
" Vista is crap "(thanx storm) and "It's poop." (thanx David) is kind of like ...well...asking for it.
Vista has not been a smooth transition. And there will be more bumps ahead. It is inevitable as with all grand dreams. (ya I know, give me a break here) Vista after all was brand new from the bottom up. A complete rewrite. Intended to be the solution to the problems of previous OSes. And in my honest opinion if the GDed hardware companies would not have been so GDed lazy, arrogant, and short sited maybe most of the problems we all hear about now would have been null.
anyway thats not the case so
"Long live x64 SP2 :177289i5o3snv8uw: "
I just gotta add: x64 SP2 just works, baby, yeah!
Edited by bluerip, 01 May 2007 - 03:20 AM.
#18 Guest_scaramonga_*
Posted 01 May 2007 - 03:29 AM
Quote
I remember a previous version that did the same.........
#19
Posted 01 May 2007 - 03:41 AM
#20 Guest_scaramonga_*
#22
Posted 08 May 2007 - 08:25 AM
#23
Posted 11 May 2007 - 10:46 PM
I really love XP x64. It's just been great. Even if there was nothing to look forward to I don't think I'd be depressed.
XP64 ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!YEAH :thaustin_powers_animated_dancin :265580cwz4p16bjl: :dancing4:
#24
Posted 22 May 2007 - 10:38 AM
hog, on May 1 2007, 03:34 AM, said:
#25
Posted 22 May 2007 - 04:20 PM
Personnally, Vista works good for me except, again, for SLi. I don't LOVE it, but it fills my needs. I haven't tried XP x64 so I can't say anything about it, but maybe it's better since so many seem to like it better. Only, personally, going from XP 32-bit to Vista was a good choice for me.
#26
Posted 23 May 2007 - 12:29 AM
Sorry if I came across a little strong in my other post in this thread. Ask anybody here that knows me, that was not my intension.
#27
Posted 23 May 2007 - 05:10 AM
#28
Posted 24 May 2007 - 01:12 AM
David_Heavey, on May 22 2007, 08:29 PM, said:
Sorry if I came across a little strong in my other post in this thread. Ask anybody here that knows me, that was not my intension.
#30
Posted 25 May 2007 - 01:15 AM
hog, on May 22 2007, 09:20 AM, said:
Personnally, Vista works good for me except, again, for SLi. I don't LOVE it, but it fills my needs. I haven't tried XP x64 so I can't say anything about it, but maybe it's better since so many seem to like it better. Only, personally, going from XP 32-bit to Vista was a good choice for me.
Vista was acceptable though not worth the purchase price based on the way 3 of my systems ran with betas and even 1 with the rtm. I stated it was crap/pooh take your pick. Same s_it different color because affter 4 successful experiences it has failed to install on my latest builds which are quad-core Q6600s . It wouldn't install on either the Infinity P965S or the LanParty ICFX3200T2R/G despite having so called "Vista drivers." Installs failed at: "Finalizing installation" on both boards. Crap! Crap! Crap! I have a $200. paper weight that cant' be returned. Don't we have a "bird" emoticon than can be inserted here? I do of course have the option of trading the key for x64 and losing $60. Bleep MS Vista the the freakin horse it road in on. ( this is for the 8 hours plus I wasted trying to get it to work and the $400. Vid card it destroyed because I couldn't install and load drivers to stop the hsf from running full throttle burning up in the process. And the $200 I paid for a product that won't install) I'll be going full Linux as soon as I'm up to speed which may take some time. Vista is 10 giant steps backward IMHO. XP was much better on initial release!
Edited by WFO, 25 May 2007 - 01:23 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users