Jump to content


Cooler weather means turning on those heaters


  • Please log in to reply
65 replies to this topic

#46 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 27 September 2007 - 06:08 PM

thanks kelps. i think i will run the two as you outlined (this was posted previously, but now that i have it in front of me again, i'll take advantage of the info :talker: ).

#47 brewin

brewin

    Victory is mine!

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,262 posts
  • Location:Missouri
  • Interests:Anything interesting.
  • Country:USA

Posted 27 September 2007 - 06:15 PM

I would recommend using the SMP client on any multi-core system, unless it's absolutely not possible for whatever reason. Kelpfries, if you ran the SMP client on all those servers, you'd probably be pulling in about 30,000 points per week. Maybe 20,000 if you run them at 60%. The work units for the SMP client are worth a lot more than the single-core client.

But I haven't used the Windows SMP client, so maybe it sucks so bad that it's not worth it. Hopefully they'll improve it if that's the case.

:roadrunner: :talker:

#48 KelpFries

KelpFries

    Oops....my bad!

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 156 posts
  • Location:New Jersey
  • Interests:Getting through the day without being hassled.
  • Country:USA

Posted 27 September 2007 - 06:47 PM

The SMP client will give more points, but it should not be used on a 2 core machine, it is recommended that you run it on a machine that has at least 4 cores because there have been problems and issues on 2 core machines.

#49 Nvyseal

Nvyseal

    Chairman of the Board

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,824 posts
  • Location:From the whatever it is, Pluto
  • Country:USA

Posted 27 September 2007 - 07:09 PM

View PostKelpFries, on Sep 27 2007, 11:47 AM, said:

The SMP client will give more points, but it should not be used on a 2 core machine, it is recommended that you run it on a machine that has at least 4 cores because there have been problems and issues on 2 core machines.
All my machines are dual core and it runs the SMP client fine

Attached File  dual.JPG   90.53K   1 downloads

#50 brewin

brewin

    Victory is mine!

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,262 posts
  • Location:Missouri
  • Interests:Anything interesting.
  • Country:USA

Posted 27 September 2007 - 07:15 PM

View PostKelpFries, on Sep 27 2007, 01:47 PM, said:

The SMP client will give more points, but it should not be used on a 2 core machine, it is recommended that you run it on a machine that has at least 4 cores because there have been problems and issues on 2 core machines.
I know it uses 4 MPI nodes, so it works better on four cores. But it works fine on two. Unless there's a specific problem with the Windows client that I'm not aware of?


I didn't know the v6 beta had been released.

http://folding.stanf...edu/FAQ-v6.html

#51 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 27 September 2007 - 07:48 PM

View Postbrewin, on Sep 27 2007, 12:15 PM, said:

I didn't know the v6 beta had been released.

http://folding.stanf...edu/FAQ-v6.html

i was checking that out this morning. looks like there is no offical v6 smp client yet, but you can run smp work units with it? i'll have to have another cup of coffee before i can make heads or tails of what they mean...

#52 brewin

brewin

    Victory is mine!

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,262 posts
  • Location:Missouri
  • Interests:Anything interesting.
  • Country:USA

Posted 27 September 2007 - 07:59 PM

View Postm.oreilly, on Sep 27 2007, 02:48 PM, said:

i was checking that out this morning. looks like there is no offical v6 smp client yet, but you can run smp work units with it? i'll have to have another cup of coffee before i can make heads or tails of what they mean...
v6 of Windows SMP client hasn't been released yet. But when it is, the install procedure will be the same as the last version. That's all they mean really.

#53 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 27 September 2007 - 08:18 PM

View Postbrewin, on Sep 27 2007, 12:59 PM, said:

v6 of Windows SMP client hasn't been released yet. But when it is, the install procedure will be the same as the last version. That's all they mean really.
so this:

Quote

- integration of SMP support into the standard client. Run with the -smp
flag on eligible hardware to receive SMP units.
means that you would need to also have an smp client install, or that they will soon have a gui smp client?

#54 brewin

brewin

    Victory is mine!

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,262 posts
  • Location:Missouri
  • Interests:Anything interesting.
  • Country:USA

Posted 27 September 2007 - 08:48 PM

View Postm.oreilly, on Sep 27 2007, 03:18 PM, said:

so this:

means that you would need to also have an smp client install, or that they will soon have a gui smp client?
No, the SMP and single-core console client are combined. I don't know exactly how it will work with Windows. In Linux, I just passed it "-smp" and it continued the WU I'd been working on with v5.

#55 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:36 PM

i'll need to find out were to enter the "-smp" line in windows...

#56 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2007 - 12:13 AM

Ok.......got my G/F comp slaving for me :P

Installed the Win SMP client there and I get this???

Posted Image

WTF???

Asks for name & pass etc (which never happened on mine) but it will not run? :talker: :roadrunner: :talker:

#57 brewin

brewin

    Victory is mine!

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,262 posts
  • Location:Missouri
  • Interests:Anything interesting.
  • Country:USA

Posted 28 September 2007 - 12:41 AM

View Postscaramonga, on Sep 27 2007, 07:13 PM, said:

Ok.......got my G/F comp slaving for me :P

Installed the Win SMP client there and I get this???

Posted Image

WTF???

Asks for name & pass etc (which never happened on mine) but it will not run? :talker: :roadrunner: :talker:
Did you run install.bat as admin? And is .NET 2.0 installed?

#58 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2007 - 12:48 AM

View Postbrewin, on Sep 28 2007, 01:41 AM, said:

Did you run install.bat as admin? And is .NET 2.0 installed?


Yup Brew.

This is what happens when I run 'install.bat' (only XP Pro 32 (SP2) on here) and .NET 2.0 installed beforehand buddy :talker:

Not a big deal......but I thought she has 2 cores going to waste so why not????..........:roadrunner:

#59 brewin

brewin

    Victory is mine!

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,262 posts
  • Location:Missouri
  • Interests:Anything interesting.
  • Country:USA

Posted 28 September 2007 - 01:16 AM

View Postscaramonga, on Sep 27 2007, 07:48 PM, said:

Yup Brew.

This is what happens when I run 'install.bat' (only XP Pro 32 (SP2) on here) and .NET 2.0 installed beforehand buddy :talker:

Not a big deal......but I thought she has 2 cores going to waste so why not????..........:roadrunner:
What is "ddd"? Shouldn't you just press enter at account and then put in the password for "Lizzo"?

It could also be a firewall problem.

#60 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2007 - 01:30 AM

Quote

What is "ddd"? Shouldn't you just press enter at account and then put in the password for "Lizzo"?

It could also be a firewall problem.



LOL...........'ddd' was me gettin peed off with entering names & passes........this system has no names and passwords set!!!?

She's on that BT Home Hub (UK) and it's bad. They are now blocking torrent downloads and regulating her bandwidth........piece of crap buddy!

Dunno if that will affect this? but hey, it was worth a shot :talker: :roadrunner:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users