Jump to content


PDC Windows7: anybody try it yet?


  • Please log in to reply
128 replies to this topic

#76 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 03 November 2008 - 07:24 PM

it is a pre beta, so...but very zippy :)

#77 Linoman

Linoman

    Established Member

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,536 posts
  • Country:South Africa (Cape-Town)

Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:43 PM

Thanks, I think I will wait until beta 1 before I use my bandwidth on this.

#78 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:08 PM

the task manager reports 99% cpu usage every 15 seconds or so. it goes from 0 to 99 lol, but i'm not seeing any bad effect from this, and the graph is reporting this, not the verbose. it displays the same (99% for system idle processes, so i can't find the culprit) number for cpu usage throughout the graph's traverse.

#79 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:27 PM

Quote

(99% for system idle processes, so i can't find the culprit)

Which is what it should be MO, 99% doing nothing, as in IDLE. :)

Posted Image

#80 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 03 November 2008 - 10:19 PM

lol no lol. the graph pegs, but the idle processes stay the same, as there is no process making it rise, as would normally be displayed. the verbose display (as you posted) is what i get, even when the cpu graph pegs 100%, so the task manager is not functioning as it should...the verbose shows what the idle processes have in reserve, not that they are using 100%...

#81 eniparadoxgma

eniparadoxgma

    Thomas S. Arashikage

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 794 posts
  • Country:USA

Posted 03 November 2008 - 10:36 PM

I've read about people "trimming" Windows 7 down to where it only uses about 485mb at idle (lol).

I was just wondering if you guys also had about 1gb used at idle.

And for a pre-beta, it seems quite polished. However, I think the reason for that is that it's 95% Vista. :)

Any news on WinFS yet? Will it make it to Windows 7?

#82 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 03 November 2008 - 11:11 PM

i dunno i think they canned it...did you get the superbar running?

#83 eniparadoxgma

eniparadoxgma

    Thomas S. Arashikage

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 794 posts
  • Country:USA

Posted 03 November 2008 - 11:50 PM

View Postm.oreilly, on Nov 3 2008, 06:11 PM, said:

i dunno i think they canned it...did you get the superbar running?

I actually dont' even know what that is. Is that just a different gui for the taskbar or does actually function differently? (I'll google it up right quick)

They canned WinFS? What? lol

#84 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:07 AM

Managed to get it installing ok under Virtual Box :) (just used Vista profile lol!!)

Posted Image

We'll see how it goes :giggle:

#85 Guest_scaramonga_*

Guest_scaramonga_*
  • Guests

Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:27 AM

Installed ok, deja vu???

Feels like I'm right back @ January 2007 lol! :)

Attached File  win7deskie.png   559.26K   1 downloads

#86 stormrosson

stormrosson

    Established Member

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,252 posts
  • Location:Silver City ,New Mexico
  • Interests:stuff
  • Country:yes

Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:32 AM

:) installed without a hitch, all drivers except my webcam came native, seems pretty quick, idles using 835 MB's....oops thats with FF open at the desktop it's 770 MB's idle ....so far so good now to see where the crap is hiding hehehe :giggle:

Edited by stormrosson, 04 November 2008 - 01:38 AM.


#87 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:45 AM

my install seems more stable this time around (i've also taken the precaution of installing "vista boot pro" on my xp x64 partition, just in case things go south). if anybody gets keys (vista beta/rc ones, i have heard, might work), let me know...

#88 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:46 AM

gonna put skype on it

#89 m.oreilly

m.oreilly

    rog'er wilco

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,864 posts
  • Country:lower uncton

Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:49 AM

that didnt work...crashes when logging in...no go...

#90 eniparadoxgma

eniparadoxgma

    Thomas S. Arashikage

  • Sponsor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 794 posts
  • Country:USA

Posted 04 November 2008 - 02:04 AM

View Postm.oreilly, on Nov 3 2008, 08:45 PM, said:

my install seems more stable this time around (i've also taken the precaution of installing "vista boot pro" on my xp x64 partition, just in case things go south). if anybody gets keys (vista beta/rc ones, i have heard, might work), let me know...

And THAT'S one thing I forgot to do. If I unplug the drive it's on (it's a separate physical drive) will I still have issues with my booting my other operating system?




4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users